Wednesday, November 11, 2009

HEALTH and HOUSEHOLD STATISTICS

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO SOURCE OF HEALTH SERVICES


Greater part of the household goes to the hospital as their sources of health services with a frequency of two hundred ninety two (292) and a percentage of thirty four point ninety three percent (34.93%) while the smallest part of the percentage utilize other source of health services with a frequency of two (2) and percentage of zero point four percent (0.4%)

The finding revealed that greater part of the households goes to the hospital as their source of their services.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Source of Health Services

Category

Frequency

Percentage

Hospital

292

34.93%

Health Center

246

29.43%

Private Doctor

175

20.93%

Clinic

48

5.74%

Herbolaryo

44

5.26%

Mananawas

23

2.75%

Manghihilot

6

0.72%

Others

2

0.24%

Total

836

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO TYPE OF FAMILY

More than half of the household has a nuclear type of family with the frequency of five hundred sixty one (561) and a percentage of sixty eight point seventy five percent (68.75%) while the lowest number of the household have cohabitating type of family with the frequency of seventeen (17) and a percentage of two point zero eight percent (2.08%)

The finding revealed that more than half of the households have nuclear type of family

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to type of Family

Category

Frequency

Percentage

Nuclear

561

68.75%

Extended

200

24.51%

Single-parent

38

4.66%

Cohabitating

17

2.08%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO RELIGION

Most of the respondents are catholic with a frequency of four thousand two hundred sixteen (4,216) or ninety two point ninety five percent (92.95%) while the seven point zero five percent (7.05%)

The findings revealed that most of the respondents are catholic

Table: Religion

CATEGORIES

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Catholic

4,216

92.95%

Non-Catholic

320

7.05%

Total

4,536

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO MONTHLY INCOME

Greater part of the households are poor with a frequency five hundred sixty three (563) or sixty nine percent (69%) while the smallest part of households are not poor with a frequency of two hundred fifty three (253) or thirty one percent (31%)

The findings revealed that the greater part of the households is poor.

Table: Monthly Income.

CATEGORIES

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Poor

563

69%

Not Poor

253

31%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO NUTRITIONAL STATUS (CHILDREN 0-60 MONTHS)

More than half of the children aging zero (0) to sixty (60) months were malnourished with a frequency of two hundred seventy nine (279) and a percentage of fifty point zero nine (50.09%) while the fewest number of children were over nourished with a frequency of twenty five (25) and a percentage of four point forty-nine percent (4.49%).

The findings revealed that more than half of the children aging zero (0) to sixty (60) months were malnourished.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Nutritional Status (0-60 months)

CATEGORIES

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Malnourished

279

50.09%

Nourished

253

45.42%

Over Nourished

25

4.49%

Total

557

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO IMMUNIZATION STATUS (CHILDREN 0-12 MONTHS)

More that half of the children aging zero (0) to twelve (12) months have complete immunization status with a frequency of seventy five (75) and a percentage of fifty-four point seventy four percent (54.74%) while few numbers of children were not yet immunized with a frequency of ten (10) and a percentage of seven point three percent (7.3%).

The findings revealed that more than half of the children aging zero (0) to twelve (12) months had complete immunization status.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Immunization Status (0-12 months)

Category

Frequency

Percentage

Complete

75

54.74%

Incomplete

52

37.96%

Never been immunized

10

7.3%

Total

137

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO TYPES OF INFANT FEEDING

More than half of the infants were being bottle fed with a frequency of seventy two (72) and a percentage of fifty two point fifty five percent (52.55%) while the least number of infant were being mixed fed with a frequency of nineteen (19) and percentage of thirteen point eighty seven percent (13.87%) The findings revealed that more than half of the infants are being bottle-fed

Frequency and Percentage distribution as to types of Infant Feeding

Category

Frequency

Percentage

Bottle Feeding

72

52.55%

Breast Feeding

46

33.58%

Mixed Feeding

19

13.87%

Total

137

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO TYPES OF MILK FORMULA

Out of ninety one (91) children, ninety one (91) or one hundred percent (100) of the children had a powdered type of milk formula.

The findings revealed that all children were given powdered type of milk formula

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to type of Milk Formula

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Powdered

91

100%

Total

91

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO TYPE OF HOUSE STRUCTURE

Most of the households have a concrete type of house structure with a frequency of five hundred twenty five (525) and a percentage of sixty four point thirty four (64.34%) while the least of the respondents have a light type of house structure with a frequency of one (1) and a percentage of zero point twelve percent (0.12%)

The findings revealed that most of the households have a concrete type of house structure.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Type of House Structure

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Concrete

525

64.34%

Semi-concrete

240

29.41%

Wood

50

6.13%

Light

1

0.12%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO NATURAL VENTILATION

More than half of the households have adequate natural ventilation with a frequency of five hundred eighty four (584) or seventy one point fifty seven percent (71.57%) while the remaining household have inadequate natural ventilation with a frequency of two hundred thirty two (232) or twenty eight point forty three percent (22.43%).

The findings revealed that majority of the households have adequate natural ventilation.

Table: Natural Ventilation

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Adequate

584

71.57%

Inadequate

232

28.43%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO SOURCE OF NATURAL LIGHTING

Majority of the households have adequate source of natural lighting with a frequency of six hundred thirty three (633) or seventy seven point fifty seven percent (77.57%) while the remaining households have inadequate source of natural lighting with a frequency of one hundred eighty three (183) or twenty point forty three percent (22.43%).

The findings revealed that majority of the households have adequate source of natural lighting.

Table: Source of Natural Lighting

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Adequate

633

77.57%

Inadequate

183

22.43%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO HYGIENIC STATUS OF TOILET FACILITY

Nearly half of the households have fair toilet facility which constitute to three hundred ninety (399) or forty nine point twenty six percent (49.26%) while seventy (70) of the respondents or eight point sixty four percent (8.64%) have toilet facility when it comes to hygienic status.

The findings revealed that nearly half of the households do have a fair toilet facility in terms of hygienic status.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Hygienic status of Toilet Facility

Category

Frequency

Percentage

Fair

399

49.26%

Good

341

42.1%

Poor

70

8.64%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO WATER FACILITY

Most of the households have private type of water supply with a frequency of six hundred thirty two (632) or seventy seven point forty five percent (77.45%) while the least of households have public type of water facility with a frequency of ninety (90) or eleven point zero three percent (11.03%).

The findings revealed that most of the households have private type of water supply facility.

Table: Water Supply Facility.

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Private

632

77345%

Share

94

11.52%

Public

90

11.03%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY

Greater number of households utilize their water system as their source of water supply with a frequency of six hundred fifty four (654) or eighty point fifteen percent (80.15%) while few number of households have their jetmatic as their source of water supply with a frequency of eight (8) or zero point ninety eight percent (0.98%).

The findings revealed that majority of households utilize their water system as their source of water supply.

Table: Source of Water Supply

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Water System

654

80.15%

Pitcher Pump

139

17.03%

Deep Well

15

1.84%

Jetmatic

8

0.98

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO COVERING DRINKING WATER STORAGE

More than half of the households cover their drinking water storage with a frequency of seven hundred seventy five (775) or ninety four point ninety eighty percent (94.98%) while the least of households do not cover their drinking water storage with a frequency of forty one (41) of five point zero two percent (5.02%).

The findings revealed that greater number of households cover their drinking water storage.

Table: Covering Drinking Water Storage.

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Covered

775

94.98%

Uncovered

41

5.02%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO METHOD OF GARBAGE DISPOSAL

Majority of the households garbage were collected by a garbage collector with a frequency of seven hundred ten (710) and a percentage of eighty seven point zero one percent (87.01%) while the least number of households use burying as their method of garbage disposal with a frequency of nine (9) and a percentage of one point ten percent (1.10%).

The findings revealed that majority of the households methods of garbage disposal is through collection.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to Method of Garbage Disposal

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Collection

710

87.01%

Dumping

75

9.19%

Burning

22

2.70%

Burying

9

1.10%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO TYPE OF GARBAGE DISPOSAL

Most of the households dispose their garbage on a sack with a frequency of five hundred forty six (546) and a percentage of sixty six point ninety one percent (66.91%) while the least number of households dispose their garbage in a box with a frequency of four (4) and a percentage of zero point forty nine percent (0.49%).

The findings revealed that majority of the household dispose their garbage in a sack.

Frequency and Percentage Distribution as to type of Garbage Disposal

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Sack

546

66.91%

Plastic bag

172

21.08%

Container

47

5.76%

Drum

32

3.92%

Can

9

1.10%

Pail

6

0.74%

Box

4

0.49%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO COVERAGE OF TRASH CONTAINER

Majority of the households cover trash container with a frequency of four hundred thirty three (433) or fifty three point zero six percent (53.06%) while the remaining households uncover trash container with a frequency of three hundred eighty three (383) or forty six point ninety four percent (46.94%).

The findings revealed that majority of households cover their trash container.

Table: Coverage of Trash Containers

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Covered

433

53.06%

Uncovered

383

46.94%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO SEWAGE SYSTEM

The biggest number of the households have open sewage system with a frequency of six hundred four (604) or seventy four point zero two percent (74.02%) while the smallest number of households have no sewage system with a frequency of twenty six (26) or three point nineteen percent (3.19%).

The findings revealed that the biggest number of households have open sewage system.

Table: Sewage System

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Open

604

74.02%

Blind

186

22.79%

None

26

3.19%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO METHOD OF PEST CONTROL

Almost all of the households use chemical method of pests control with a frequency of five hundred eighty three (583) or seventy one point forty five percent (71.45%) while the remaining households use physical method of pests control with a frequency of two hundred thirty three (233) of twenty eighty point fifty five percent (28.55%).

The findings revealed that almost all of the households use chemical method of pest control.

Table: Method of Pest Control

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Chemical

583

71.45%

Physical

233

28.55%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO METHOD OF EXCRETA DISPOSAL

Most of the households use septic tank with or without water carriage with a frequency of eight hundred ten (810) or ninety point twenty six percent (99.26%) while the least of households uses squat method with a frequency of one (1) or zero point twelve percent (0.12%).

The findings revealed that most of the household uses septic tank with or without water carriage.

The findings revealed that most of the household uses septic tank with or without water carriage.

Table: Method of Excreta Disposal

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Septic Tank with or without Water Carriage

810

99.26%

Wrap or Throw

5

0.16%

Squat Method

1

0.12%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO FOOD SOURCE

Greater than half of the households buy their food in the market with a frequency six hundred fifty two (652) or seventy nine point ninety percent (79.90%) while the least number of households produce their own food with a frequency of one (1) or zero point twelve percent (0.12%).

The findings revealed that most of the households buy their food in the market.

Table: Food Source

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Market

652

79.90%

Sari-sari Store

119

14.58%

Ambulant Vendor

44

5.39%

Own Produce

1

0.12%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO FOOD COVERAGE STATUS

Greater number of households cover their foods regularly with a frequency of seven hundred fifty six (756) or ninety two point sixty five percent (92.65%) while the remaining households leave foods uncovered with a frequency of sixty (60) or seven point thirty five percent (7.35%).

The findings revealed that majority of households cover their foods regularly.

Table: Food Coverage Status

CATEGORIES

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Covered

756

92.65%

Uncovered

60

7.35%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO FOOD COVERAGE STATUS

Greater number of households cover their foods regularly with a frequency of seven hundred fifty six (756) of ninety two point sixty five percent (92.65%) while the remaining households leave foods uncovered with a frequency of sixty (60) or seven point thirty five percent (7.35%).

The findings revealed that majority of households cover their foods regularly.

Table: Food Coverage Status

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Covered

756

92.65%

Uncovered

60

7.35%

Total

816

100%

FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION AS TO GENERAL SANITARY CONDITION

Most of the households have fair general sanitary condition with a frequency of four hundred thirty eight (438) of fifty three point sixty eight percent (53.68%) while the least of households have poor general sanitary condition with a frequency of thirty eight (38) or four point sixty six percent (4.66%).

The findings revealed that most of the households have fair general sanitary condition.

Table: General Sanitary Condition.

CATEGORIES

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Fair

436

53.68%

Good

340

41.67%

Poor

38

4.66%

Total

816

100%




No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
There was an error in this gadget